Random Card of the Day |
Friday, December 20, 2019Set: 1993 SCD Sports Card Pocket Price Guide (Rate) “ I wonder if the magazine licensed the design from Topps? This is the 1973 or 74 Football design (I can't remember, football's not my thing, although I do have some of this design in my collection) ” -Billy Kingsley
“ Nigel Wilson, David Nied, the first two taken in the Marlins/Rockies Expansion Draft. Future Hall of Famers they were not. As for the card, the front is pretty boring, but I like the back. That is some trivia though. I can only name a handful of player's high schools and those are all people from my hometown. ” -davidhandberry
“ Awesome uniform. ” -ShoTime
“ Very nice relatively unknown card, first time i ever see it. Very impressive for a magazine card. Never got much of a shot at playing with his hometown team. ” -baseballcardstoreca
“ Nice retro/magazine card. I recall sometime last year (I think) someone had sent me some cards which included a couple of these "Pocket Price Guide" cards not this specific one but similar looking cards baseball players on a football card design (or vice versa) ” -captkirk42
“ I like the old school Marlins uniforms much better than the new ones for sure! ” -RoyalChief
|
Thursday, December 19, 2019Set: 2010 Topps USA Baseball (Rate) “ Good photo, not a bad design, I just really prefer cards of MLB players. ” -chvlDm
“ Great card. ” -parsley24
“ So Chris is just OK? Nice looking card but personally I don't like the USA team cards of any set. Unless it is of one of my super PC players I try to avoid these things. Most of the players were never drafted and only have these Team USA cards, although now days a single player has 100s of cards even if they only have 1 card due to the overexess of parallels and planned variations. ” -captkirk42
“ Okey Dokey. ” -rmitchell6700
“ Not bad at all. A decent design with a nice photo. Plenty of info on the back. Not much more could be expected (or asked for) from a USA Team card. ” -spazmatastic
|
Wednesday, December 18, 2019Set: 2006 Topps Heritage (Rate) “ Topps has such a vast history of designs, but almost never crosses sports (or sports with non-sports). An almost untapped field...it's nice to see on the rare occasions when they do it, as is here. ” -Billy Kingsley
“ This card packs a punch. ” -parsley24
“ I know it's been used and abused over and over again, but I'll never get tired of this classic Topps design. I kinda wish they had used this template for the Living Set, even at the expense of the artwork. ” -mkaz80
“ Love this Heritage set. Even though it is based on a baseball design. I definitely need to complete my team sets of the Skins and Rams maybe even go for the full base set. ” -captkirk42
“ Decent design but don't like that it was also for the baseball set and I don't know for sure but probably basketball and hockey as well. ” -davidhandberry
“ 2005 heritage was one of my favorite sets of all time they used like 5 different classic designs, shortprints, and rookie variations, but when 2006 came out I was kinda disappointed they only used the one design, I did like the looks of it though and was disappointed when they didn't bring back heritage in 2007, also one of my favorite parts of heritage was the thick non glossy cardstock ” -Thunderfoot
“ Really nice looking card. The color looks off, I can't tell if that is the scan or the throwback look of the card, but I like it either way. ” -muskie027
“ Too much border, not enough stats, awful facsimile auto. He was an amazing receiver for his 5' 9". Unfortunately, football players rarely have a lengthy career. ” -baseballcardstoreca
|
Tuesday, December 17, 2019Set: 2009-10 Upper Deck Artifacts - Silver (Rate) “ Artifacts is not my favorite brand but I am glad to see another hockey Card of the Day. And a serial numbered parallel to boot! ” -Billy Kingsley
“ Very nice looking Artifacts card Front and back. ” -captkirk42
“ I don't collect hockey, but this gives me a burst of nostalgia for the days before Topps had the exclusive MLB licence. ” -jackal726
“ I really like this, the background is great. No complaints except it being hockey, not baseball. ” -davidhandberry
|
Monday, December 16, 2019Set: 1975 Topps - Team Checklists Gray Back (Rate) Card: #146 San Diego Padres / John McNamara “ A team checklist card. Now that there is a handy thing to have. I like how the manager's mug is spotlighted. Excellent concept put into practice on this excellent card. ” -CollectingAfterDeath
“ Cool team check list ” -parsley24
“ Before we had TCDB, we needed these checklist cards to help us keep track of which cards we had and which ones we needed for our team sets! ” -mkaz80
“ Team cards are always cool! ” -Billy Kingsley
“ Nice team photo. Not thrilled with the advertising on the back ” -NJDevils
“ Absolutely LOVE 1975 Topps. As a kid even though I thought I had gotten a ton of it, I didn't have that much of the set. I still don't :( ” -captkirk42
“ Love the team checklist/photo cards. Wish they remained in the flagship set each year. ” -rmitchell6700
“ My 2nd set. Bought it with my own money. I was 8. ” -cjjt
“ Love these older cards. ” -muskie027
|
Saturday, December 14, 2019Set: 2003 Rittenhouse The Complete Star Trek Deep Space Nine (Rate) “ Kind of a cool card for non-sport. ” -muskie027
“ Very random Star Trek Deep Space Nine card. I honestly don't recall seeing this episode and I think I saw all the DS9 episodes or at least 95% of them. ” -captkirk42
|
Thursday, December 12, 2019Set: 2002-03 Topps Xpectations - Xcitement (Rate) “ This is just horrible! All the diagonal text is bad, the front logos are bad, the background is bad. It looks like he's wearing a practice uniform too! And why did they compare his college stats to Payton's pro stats?! Only his blocks stat is nice. No wonder the guy wasn't drafted AND I've never heard of him. ” -spazmatastic
“ I always say that I wish Topps would be more inventive. Maybe I shouldn't wish that. Topps trying to being inventive is UG....LY. From the horizonal writing to the color scheme to the duplicate photo. If they had simply left the writing horizontal it would be a decent card but that killed it for me. ” -davidhandberry
“ Never heard of these nor ever seen any til' now. Looks very bland and fond of the letter x like Upper Deck. ” -baseballcardstoreca
“ Junior Harrington...made a big splash for a short time, then got traded and disappeared from the league. I loved this set when it was new, not so much now...but I still want to complete it some day. I need to work on the sn portion of the set more. ” -Billy Kingsley
“ Branding looks like the basketball court markings. Very odd and a bit too plain. Back would be OK if text were straight not at a weird angle. ” -captkirk42
“ I unapologetically like this card. As cluttered as it was, I miss this era of Topps cards. ” -mkaz80
“ Xcrappy Xbackground ” -NJDevils
“ Terrible. Same pic front & back. Text on back difficult to read. ” -cjjt
|
Wednesday, December 11, 2019Set: 2001-02 Pacific Private Stock Titanium - Retail Parallel (Rate) “ Glad to a numbered hockey card, but they really phoned it in on this design, or lack thereof. I do think it's cool that the scanned card is #031/131. ” -Billy Kingsley
“ Nice card. I miss the Pacific brands. Pretty cool serial number 031/131 An Ebay 1/1 LOL. ” -captkirk42
“ I was still collecting hockey at the time of this cards release and Pacific was by far my favorite brand. ” -Corky
“ After several mediocre hockey cards recently, this one is amazing. Perfection except it being a parallel. ” -davidhandberry
“ Seems kind of empty, and bland. There is no "pop" to this card. ” -CollectingAfterDeath
|