1976 TCMA Goudey Reprints Baseball Forum

The cards in this checklist are listed by year and company, then by number within each. Even though this is a reprint set, should it be a straight numerical checklist with the note 2 fields as is?

Good question. We can do it the way you mentioned or....

1 - We can break it into 7 different sets (there looks to be 7 different sets reprinted in this "set")
2 - We can break them into different "insert sets" and have the set listed with no base set. I would say that this would only be able to be done if this set was ONLY issued as a 96-card "factory set".

Let's see how the set was distributed, and we can go from there.

How were these determined to be TCMA reprints?  Fritsch and Galasso Goudey reprints have the year of reprint, not "123".  Other TCMA reprints I've seen have "TCMA Reprint" on them.