Posted By | Message |
jacksoncoupage
Posts: 212
Joined: Nov 2017
|
Thursday, September 1, 2022 10:35 PM | |
Just a note that Randall Hill's Final Update card #843 only exists in one version (listed here as 843b) and was never corrected /changed. 1991 Final Update only had one print run.
-------------------------------
Owner and creator of JunkWaxGems, online source for unlisted error, variation and oddball info from the junk wax era.
|
|
|
|
vrooomed
Posts: 15,104
Joined: Dec 2012
|
Friday, September 2, 2022 5:31 AM | |
Thanks for this information. I have seen your name on other forums for many, many years and understand (and respect) your position on these Pro Set releases. I have entered IRs (Inaccuracy Reports) to have the front images removed for the [a] and [c] versions. Once they are removed, we can then move the collection data to the current [b] version and remove the versioning info on that card (as it will be the only card #843 listed). Again, thanks.
-------------------------------
-- Dan -- Note: Please see my profile for more info regarding trading (section updated 3/4/2024). I have added a large portion of my inventory to the site, and currently have trading turned on (details are in my profile).
|
|
|
|
jacksoncoupage
Posts: 212
Joined: Nov 2017
|
Friday, September 2, 2022 12:50 PM | |
Thank you for the kind words, much appreciated.
While I certainly would love for these to exist, there is zero evidence of a second printing of 1991 Final Update. I'd image a corrected Willie Green card would also exist if so.
-------------------------------
Owner and creator of JunkWaxGems, online source for unlisted error, variation and oddball info from the junk wax era.
|
|
|
|
PapyB
Posts: 18
Joined: Feb 2021
|
Friday, November 11, 2022 1:39 AM | |
Dan, thanks for completing the corrections to card #843.
There may be a similar problem for card #175-D. The current back image is actually a duplicate of 175-A. According to the OP's research/blogs, card #175-D may not exist. Jacksoncoupage can you confirm? Thx...
If 175-D is a phantom, the collections should probably merge into 175-A.
|
|
|
|
vrooomed
Posts: 15,104
Joined: Dec 2012
|
Friday, November 11, 2022 5:49 AM | |
The back image here for 175[d] is definitely the same as 175[a] (or was, I put in an IR to get it removed - just the back for now).
I don't want to remove 175[d] yet, in case it actually does exist, but we just had a bad image here. Any help in verifying its existence is appreciated.
-------------------------------
-- Dan -- Note: Please see my profile for more info regarding trading (section updated 3/4/2024). I have added a large portion of my inventory to the site, and currently have trading turned on (details are in my profile).
|
|
|
|
jacksoncoupage
Posts: 212
Joined: Nov 2017
|
Friday, November 11, 2022 11:22 AM | |
175-D is not real. And as far as I know, it has never been rumored to exist. I have tracked Pro Set variations consistently since 2004 (a whole lot of master lists and want lists sent my way) and this site is the first mention of it that I can recall.
And yes, it is Pro Set, where new, extremely low print run stuff is still turning up but after the huge snafu with Dickerson in 1990 and the awareness of a varieties in the 1991 card by the hobby at large, a 4th version would have turned up by now. Not to mention that it doesn't logically track with the correction timeline of the card.
-------------------------------
Owner and creator of JunkWaxGems, online source for unlisted error, variation and oddball info from the junk wax era.
|
|
|
|
vrooomed
Posts: 15,104
Joined: Dec 2012
|
Friday, November 11, 2022 1:01 PM | |
IR has been submitted to remove both images.
-------------------------------
-- Dan -- Note: Please see my profile for more info regarding trading (section updated 3/4/2024). I have added a large portion of my inventory to the site, and currently have trading turned on (details are in my profile).
|
|
|
|