Posted By | Message |
Twinsguy50
Posts: 236
Joined: Apr 2018
|
Sunday, October 15, 2023 12:26 PM | |
|
|
|
|
Arkansas Traveler
Posts: 531
Joined: Apr 2019
|
Sunday, October 15, 2023 12:39 PM | |
Is it possible that Donruss took the first 25 of the 300 and made them autographs and the rest inserts? I've heard of this being done, but not sure for this set. What does the imprinted stamp say?
|
|
|
|
Bowersbird
Posts: 485
Joined: May 2020
|
Sunday, October 15, 2023 12:40 PM | |
The SN25 note might just be wrong? Both scans show #/300. Another explanation is that it could be that the first 25 of the 300 are signed?
|
|
|
|
jacksoncoupage
Posts: 209
Joined: Nov 2017
|
Sunday, October 15, 2023 12:47 PM | |
This is exactly what happened. If you were around back them, this was a very common practice for DLP.
-------------------------------
Owner and creator of JunkWaxGems, online source for unlisted error, variation and oddball info from the junk wax era.
|
|
|
|
FreehanSolo
Posts: 1,128
Joined: Nov 2017
|
Sunday, October 15, 2023 12:52 PM | |
If we determine that's what's going on here then we can make them "AU, PR25, SN300"
|
|
|
|
cynicalbuddha
Posts: 615
Joined: Aug 2009
|
Sunday, October 15, 2023 1:02 PM | |
Beckett list this as a PR of 25. I concur and remember the same thing. League Leaders were SN to 300, and a subset of 25 of those cards had a sticker auto and stamp slapped on them.
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Twinsguy50
Posts: 236
Joined: Apr 2018
|
Sunday, October 15, 2023 1:33 PM | |
The Stamp says....Authentic Signature, above and below a 2002 Donruss logo. Would that mean that the SN300 cards are actually PR275? Since 25 of the 300 are AU? Thanks for the help! I will add the scan there then
|
|
|
|
BigEd76
Posts: 4,057
Joined: Nov 2016
|
Sunday, October 15, 2023 7:38 PM | |
Print run after SN. It's less confusing that way
-------------------------------
* Ed * L8 * Cards in my personal Collection are unavailable *
|
|
|
|